<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IsabelMarco Only Paying Premium Members</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ptcauthority.com/isabelmarco-only-paying-premium-members/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ptcauthority.com/isabelmarco-only-paying-premium-members/</link>
	<description>PTC Sites Resource Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: saneshair</title>
		<link>http://www.ptcauthority.com/isabelmarco-only-paying-premium-members/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>saneshair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ptcauthority.com/?p=160#comment-26</guid>
		<description>it may be right for IsabelMarco,now it has decided to only pay its ,premium members. they say they want only serious members. You can weed out cheaters , by other methods like , whether they are active or not, youcan check members add,ress also stop members from having multiple accounts.

some  facilities , should always be there for free -members, but it is ,

 IsabelMarco,own decision , which theycan change later

my link.. 

http://www.adverbux.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may be right for IsabelMarco,now it has decided to only pay its ,premium members. they say they want only serious members. You can weed out cheaters , by other methods like , whether they are active or not, youcan check members add,ress also stop members from having multiple accounts.</p>
<p>some  facilities , should always be there for free -members, but it is ,</p>
<p> IsabelMarco,own decision , which theycan change later</p>
<p>my link.. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.adverbux.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adverbux.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gem</title>
		<link>http://www.ptcauthority.com/isabelmarco-only-paying-premium-members/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Gem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ptcauthority.com/?p=160#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Heard this. Bad news. I was to take out my first payment with them.

A lot of people thought this pair as &quot;becoming too proud&quot; that they paid out members.

Like you I don&#039;t like their decisions of forcing members to install that pesky toolbar (I have dozens of toolbars here), bear with the numerous cheatcheckers in several ads, and the worse, install that full page ad for a few seconds before you see the countdown to that ad.

I think it would have been a better decision for them, if they had decided to pay out only premium members but allow everyone to upgrade their memberships and pay referrals using the existing IM balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Heard this. Bad news. I was to take out my first payment with them.</p>
<p>A lot of people thought this pair as &#8220;becoming too proud&#8221; that they paid out members.</p>
<p>Like you I don&#8217;t like their decisions of forcing members to install that pesky toolbar (I have dozens of toolbars here), bear with the numerous cheatcheckers in several ads, and the worse, install that full page ad for a few seconds before you see the countdown to that ad.</p>
<p>I think it would have been a better decision for them, if they had decided to pay out only premium members but allow everyone to upgrade their memberships and pay referrals using the existing IM balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
